Monday, June 3, 2013
Kids These Days
PHOTOGRAPHS By HANNAH STARKEY; STYLED By KATE LANPHEAR and JASON RIDER
Bill Gates was 20 years old. Steve Jobs was 21. Warren Buffett was 26. Ralph Lauren was 28. Estée Lauder was 29.
These now iconic names were all 20-somethings when they started their companies that would catapult them, and their enterprises, into some of the biggest successes ever known. Consider this: many of the truly remarkable innovations of the latest generation — a list that includes Google, Facebook and Twitter — were all founded by people under 30. (Mark Zuckerberg, technically, started Facebook even earlier, when he was 19; at 20 he moved to California to turn it into a business.) The number of people in their mid-20s disrupting entire industries, taking on jobs usually reserved for people twice their age and doing it in the glare of millions of social media "followers" seems to be growing almost exponentially.
So what is it about that youthful decade after those awkward teenage years that inspires such shoot-for-the-moon success? Does age really have something to do with it?
It does. And that leaves the rest of us — even those of us just a little older — at a bit of a disadvantage.
The conventional wisdom is that young people bring fresh eyes and a new perspective to confronting problems and challenges that others have given up on. Michael Moritz of Sequoia Capital, a venture capitalist who backed Google, Yahoo and YouTube, once described the phenomenon of 20-something entrepreneurs as a generation of people "who see no boundaries, see no limits, see no obstacle that they can't hurdle — it is the most stimulating environment that you can ever be in." Vinod Khosla, another venture capitalist, goes further. "People under 35 are the people who make change happen," he said at an international conference. "People over 45 basically die in terms of new ideas."
That may or may not be true, but it's only part of the story.
Peter Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal, and now an investor who was an early backer of Facebook, has another, colder theory that may explain it: Ultimately, it's about money.
"How many people do you know who said when they were young that they planned to work for a couple of years, put some money in the bank, so that they could later pursue their passion and start a new business or strike out on their own?" he asked me. "It almost never plays out that way in practice. What seems to happen is that after some period of time, people are making good money and they're typically spending all of it and it becomes really hard to dial that back. If you bought a house or have all sorts of obligations of one sort or another it may be very difficult."
In other words, it's the young people who have nothing to lose, with no mortgage and, frankly, with nothing to do on a Friday night except work, who are the ones often willing to take the biggest risks. Sure, they are talented. But it's their persistence and zeal, the desire to stay up until 6 a.m. chugging Red Bull, that is the difference between being a salaried employee and an entrepreneur.
And with the steady march of technology, young people have gained an even greater sense of credibility among their elders — still worried that they themselves don't "get it." Since the 1960s, and especially since the rise of the computer era, older people have been more willing to give opportunities to the most talented 20-somethings as the office politics of old break down. Could this latest crop of entrepreneurial success stories have made it in a pre-Twitter era? Sure. But the rapidity of this digital age has hastened their ascent.
That's not to say that most 20-somethings are finding success. They're not. The latest crop of über-successful young entrepreneurs, bloggers, designers and authors are far, far from the norm. In truth, unemployment for workers age 16 to 24 is double the national average. "Gen X" and "Gen Y" have far less wealth than their parents did at the same age, according to the Urban Institute.
One of the biggest challenges facing this next generation — and one that may prevent more visionary entrepreneurs from succeeding — is the staggering rise in the level of debt college students have been left with. If Thiel's theory is right, it is going to be harder and harder for young people to take big risks because they will be crushed with obligations before they even begin.
If you're over 29 years old and still haven't made your world-changing mark, don't despair. Some older people have had big breakthroughs, too. Thomas Edison didn't invent the phonograph until he was 30. ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
These now iconic names were all 20-somethings when they started their companies that would catapult them, and their enterprises, into some of the biggest successes ever known. Consider this: many of the truly remarkable innovations of the latest generation — a list that includes Google, Facebook and Twitter — were all founded by people under 30. (Mark Zuckerberg, technically, started Facebook even earlier, when he was 19; at 20 he moved to California to turn it into a business.) The number of people in their mid-20s disrupting entire industries, taking on jobs usually reserved for people twice their age and doing it in the glare of millions of social media "followers" seems to be growing almost exponentially.
So what is it about that youthful decade after those awkward teenage years that inspires such shoot-for-the-moon success? Does age really have something to do with it?
It does. And that leaves the rest of us — even those of us just a little older — at a bit of a disadvantage.
The conventional wisdom is that young people bring fresh eyes and a new perspective to confronting problems and challenges that others have given up on. Michael Moritz of Sequoia Capital, a venture capitalist who backed Google, Yahoo and YouTube, once described the phenomenon of 20-something entrepreneurs as a generation of people "who see no boundaries, see no limits, see no obstacle that they can't hurdle — it is the most stimulating environment that you can ever be in." Vinod Khosla, another venture capitalist, goes further. "People under 35 are the people who make change happen," he said at an international conference. "People over 45 basically die in terms of new ideas."
That may or may not be true, but it's only part of the story.
Peter Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal, and now an investor who was an early backer of Facebook, has another, colder theory that may explain it: Ultimately, it's about money.
"How many people do you know who said when they were young that they planned to work for a couple of years, put some money in the bank, so that they could later pursue their passion and start a new business or strike out on their own?" he asked me. "It almost never plays out that way in practice. What seems to happen is that after some period of time, people are making good money and they're typically spending all of it and it becomes really hard to dial that back. If you bought a house or have all sorts of obligations of one sort or another it may be very difficult."
In other words, it's the young people who have nothing to lose, with no mortgage and, frankly, with nothing to do on a Friday night except work, who are the ones often willing to take the biggest risks. Sure, they are talented. But it's their persistence and zeal, the desire to stay up until 6 a.m. chugging Red Bull, that is the difference between being a salaried employee and an entrepreneur.
And with the steady march of technology, young people have gained an even greater sense of credibility among their elders — still worried that they themselves don't "get it." Since the 1960s, and especially since the rise of the computer era, older people have been more willing to give opportunities to the most talented 20-somethings as the office politics of old break down. Could this latest crop of entrepreneurial success stories have made it in a pre-Twitter era? Sure. But the rapidity of this digital age has hastened their ascent.
That's not to say that most 20-somethings are finding success. They're not. The latest crop of über-successful young entrepreneurs, bloggers, designers and authors are far, far from the norm. In truth, unemployment for workers age 16 to 24 is double the national average. "Gen X" and "Gen Y" have far less wealth than their parents did at the same age, according to the Urban Institute.
One of the biggest challenges facing this next generation — and one that may prevent more visionary entrepreneurs from succeeding — is the staggering rise in the level of debt college students have been left with. If Thiel's theory is right, it is going to be harder and harder for young people to take big risks because they will be crushed with obligations before they even begin.
If you're over 29 years old and still haven't made your world-changing mark, don't despair. Some older people have had big breakthroughs, too. Thomas Edison didn't invent the phonograph until he was 30. ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
CHRIS HUGHES
Facebook co-founder; publisher and editor in chief of The New Republic
It was once said — by Michael Kinsley — that Al Gore
was every old person’s idea of what a young person should be. It surely
applies to The New Republic’s latest editor in chief and publisher,
Chris Hughes. He was Mark Zuckerberg’s sophomore roommate at Harvard, a
key bridge between the tech world and regular human beings, and made a
fortune of hundreds of millions of dollars from his tiny share of the
company. He moved on to lead the Obama campaign’s groundbreaking use of
the Web in 2008.
There’s a confidence about him that I certainly never had — when I, another young gay man, was handed the editorship of that august magazine at the age of 27. We’ve only met a couple of times in coffee shops and, despite my 20 years on him, I felt as if I were a kid talking with a grown-up. His hair is slicked down and neatly coiffed, his attire almost fogy, his young, clear, freckled face open.
Why on earth would an Internet multimillionaire rescue a boutique political and literary magazine that has almost always lost money? Hughes’s answer — he wants to “convene conversations” that help change the world — seems a little jejune, but sincere. There’s a vagueness that immediately evaporates when he turns to the object of his desire: “I love print,” he says. “Because it’s an incredible technology in its own right. It’s colorful, it’s cheap, it’s disposable, it’s sharable, it’s an object.” And when you pick up the new New Republic, you can see the love: the hefty solid paper pages, the superglossy cover, the thoroughly designed interior, the graphics, the use of art and photography in ways the magazine never aspired to before. Because it was too expensive.
As The New Republic turns 100 next year, it says something about its 29-year-old editor that he is seeking to make new what was recently seen as the very definition of old: paper, print, words, meaning. He is the young person’s idea of what a publisher should be. ANDREW SULLIVAN
There’s a confidence about him that I certainly never had — when I, another young gay man, was handed the editorship of that august magazine at the age of 27. We’ve only met a couple of times in coffee shops and, despite my 20 years on him, I felt as if I were a kid talking with a grown-up. His hair is slicked down and neatly coiffed, his attire almost fogy, his young, clear, freckled face open.
Why on earth would an Internet multimillionaire rescue a boutique political and literary magazine that has almost always lost money? Hughes’s answer — he wants to “convene conversations” that help change the world — seems a little jejune, but sincere. There’s a vagueness that immediately evaporates when he turns to the object of his desire: “I love print,” he says. “Because it’s an incredible technology in its own right. It’s colorful, it’s cheap, it’s disposable, it’s sharable, it’s an object.” And when you pick up the new New Republic, you can see the love: the hefty solid paper pages, the superglossy cover, the thoroughly designed interior, the graphics, the use of art and photography in ways the magazine never aspired to before. Because it was too expensive.
As The New Republic turns 100 next year, it says something about its 29-year-old editor that he is seeking to make new what was recently seen as the very definition of old: paper, print, words, meaning. He is the young person’s idea of what a publisher should be. ANDREW SULLIVAN
HELEN OYEYEMI
Author of four novels, and the forthcoming "Boy, Snow, Bird"
The daughter of Nigerian immigrants, Helen Oyeyemi,
28, wrote her first book, “The Icarus Girl,” when she was 18 and still
in school. It was met by the British literary scene with amazement and
respect. Since that debut, she has written three more novels, her latest
being “Mr. Fox,” about a complicated love triangle between a
narcissistic writer, his wife and his fictional muse. The book is a bold
experiment in storytelling, combining realism and fabulism, humor and
darkness, and a new take on folkloric fixtures like the murderous
Bluebeard. It’s a heady brew, but Oyeyemi is so fluent with narrative
that she seems to revel in its conventions and pick them apart at the
same time, fragmenting and reframing in the manner of a Jeanette
Winterson. Her age, as fun as it is to report, has really never been a
window into her writing style. Besides, she’s seemed wise beyond her
years from the very start. Her next book, “Boy, Snow, Bird,” exploring
the archetype of the wicked stepmother, comes out in 2014 from Riverhead
Books. “I’m still climbing around inside stories we all know, or think
we know, and I’m enjoying that,” she says. Oyeyemi is modest about her
rise. “The more forcibly I’m made aware of the fact that I’ll never be
the kind of storyteller I most admire, the less I’ll be troubled by
that,” she says. “I’ll probably just become more myself.” AIMEE BENDER
ALEXANDER WANG
Fashion designer of his namesake label; creative director of Balenciaga
As a teenager, Alexander Wang was working in a San
Francisco boutique after school and remaking thrift finds for his sister
and friends. “I’d hardly call them ‘hits’!” he says. Today, he sits
atop a multimillion-dollar business that bears his name, and he was
recently appointed the creative director of Balenciaga, one of the most
storied French houses in the world. Skeptics of the 29-year-old designer
might say that his press savviness, youthful good looks and
Asian-American roots — after all, China is fashion’s next big frontier —
have served him exceptionally well. But since he left the Parsons
School of Design to introduce his own line in 2007, his swift ascendancy
has been defined by a marked pragmatism that’s made him a success with
retailers and women alike: capturing the nuances of urban cool with
merchandise that’s delivered to stores on time at an accessible price.
With his Alexander Wang label, he’s picked up the baton that Calvin
Klein and Helmut Lang carried before him, infusing sportswear with an
erotic edge that suggests there’s more to life than office rigmarole. At
Balenciaga, stepping into Nicolas Ghesquire’s very big shoes, he’s
proven he can do a lot more than dress the downtown set. In his debut,
Wang has brought a demure elegance to Balenciaga’s architectural
heritage, taking classic silhouettes like high-waisted petal skirts,
molded peplums and oval-shouldered coats, and toughening them up with
paint-crackled mohair, marbleized silk, punkish velvet lace and pristine
ivory soutache. Excelling at two very high-profile jobs is a challenge,
but this is where the boundless energy and risk-taking nature of youth
is at its best. “I’m a believer in going out there, working for yourself
and being very proactive in getting what you want,” Wang says. HARRIET QUICK
BENNY BLANCO
Songwriter and music producer
There are a couple of ways to determine if that
sound percolating out of your radio is a song by Benjamin Levin, the
25-year-old songwriter-producer who goes by the name Benny Blanco.
First, there’s Blanco’s telltale sonic tang: the sugary chewiness of
bubble gum, salty hip-hop, rock crunch and a sprinkling of other, often
surprising musical ingredients. Then there’s the law of averages: if the
radio’s on, it’s probably playing his song. In the last five years,
Blanco has become one of pop’s most reliable creators of chart-topping
records. He has co-written and co-produced dozens of hits, including 15
Billboard No. 1s, by some of the world’s top artists: Rihanna, Katy
Perry, Kesha, Maroon 5, Britney Spears. It’s a startling track record
for someone whose career began so unpromisingly as a third-rate would-be
rapper. “I think somewhere along the way I realized, O.K., no one’s
gonna care about a chubby Jewish dude rapping,” Blanco says. “I realized
I’d be better behind the scenes.”
Blanco accomplished that career transformation in the time-honored manner of chubby Jewish dudes everywhere: with chutzpah. While still a teenager in the Virginia suburbs, he charmed — or rather fibbed — his way into the record industry. “I would cold-call record labels and pretend I was someone else,“ he says. “If I patched my way up to the top, I’d be like, ‘You’ve gotta listen to my mixtape!’ ” Eventually, he released a critically lauded collaboration with the Baltimore rapper Spank Rock, and came to the attention of the powerhouse songwriter-producer Dr. Luke, who installed Blanco as one of his go-to collaborators. The rest is Top 40 history. “It’s a great time to make music,” Blanco says. “It’s becoming harder and harder to decipher the line between indie, pop, country, alternative. On the radio, listeners want to be familiar with the sound that they’re like, ‘O.K. That doesn’t make me uncomfortable.’ But they also want to be like, ‘Daaaaamn! What’s that sound?’ ” JODY ROSEN
Blanco accomplished that career transformation in the time-honored manner of chubby Jewish dudes everywhere: with chutzpah. While still a teenager in the Virginia suburbs, he charmed — or rather fibbed — his way into the record industry. “I would cold-call record labels and pretend I was someone else,“ he says. “If I patched my way up to the top, I’d be like, ‘You’ve gotta listen to my mixtape!’ ” Eventually, he released a critically lauded collaboration with the Baltimore rapper Spank Rock, and came to the attention of the powerhouse songwriter-producer Dr. Luke, who installed Blanco as one of his go-to collaborators. The rest is Top 40 history. “It’s a great time to make music,” Blanco says. “It’s becoming harder and harder to decipher the line between indie, pop, country, alternative. On the radio, listeners want to be familiar with the sound that they’re like, ‘O.K. That doesn’t make me uncomfortable.’ But they also want to be like, ‘Daaaaamn! What’s that sound?’ ” JODY ROSEN
EZRA KLEIN
Washington Post columnist; MSNBC and Bloomberg View contributor
Don't ask Ezra Klein for a pithy anecdote about how
he got to be America's pre-eminent Wonkblogger. "I don't really believe
in background stories," he says. What he believes in is data — so let's
start there. Klein's Wonkblog, hosted by The Washington Post, gets more
than 5 million page views a month. His chart- and graph-heavy analyses —
like a recent 4,200-word dissection of a health care experiment for
elderly Pennsylvanians — are routinely among the most popular stories on
The Post's Web site. Wonkblog is something of an experiment itself, out
to prove that a quantitative approach to Washington can be compelling
to a mass audience. "What we've been trying to do for a long time,"
Klein says,"is figure out how to cover the political world through the
lens of policy." "A long time" is relative; Klein is 29. He graduated
from the University of California, Los Angeles in 2005 with a degree in
political science and, more important, with hundreds of blog posts to
his name. He blogged his way into a job at The American Prospect and
then came the call from The Post, where Wonkblog will turn two in
September.
What he wanted to do on his first day — make the "actual work of government" comprehensible — is what he does every day, almost as often on television (he's a contributor and a frequent fill-in host on MSNBC) as on the Web. An MSNBC anchor slot seems inevitable, seeing as how the channel's president, Phil Griffin, is among his biggest fans.
But what he sounds most excited about is grooming his fellow Wonkbloggers, all of whom, he swears, are smarter than he is. He lets out a laugh. "I didn't think I would face obsolescence this quickly." BRIAN STELTER
What he wanted to do on his first day — make the "actual work of government" comprehensible — is what he does every day, almost as often on television (he's a contributor and a frequent fill-in host on MSNBC) as on the Web. An MSNBC anchor slot seems inevitable, seeing as how the channel's president, Phil Griffin, is among his biggest fans.
But what he sounds most excited about is grooming his fellow Wonkbloggers, all of whom, he swears, are smarter than he is. He lets out a laugh. "I didn't think I would face obsolescence this quickly." BRIAN STELTER
SAMANTHA SHANNON
Author of a forthcoming literary fantasy series; college student
Could an unknown 21-year-old Oxford student named
Samantha Shannon be the next J. K. Rowling? Three years ago, Shannon was
an intern in the office of the prestigious London literary agent David
Godwin. That experience came in handy when, less than a year later, she
had a manuscript for “The Bone Season,” an ambitious novel, the first of
a projected seven-part series, that she had somehow written between
lectures. Blown away by the book’s inventiveness, Godwin promptly sent
it to the editor in chief of Bloomsbury, Alexandra Pringle. “Seven hours
later I was still reading it,” Pringle recalls. “I just fell completely
in love.” Bloomsbury gave Shannon a six-figure advance for the first
three books, an unprecedented show of support for such an untested
first-time author. “The Bone Season,” which comes out in August, is
about a 19-year-old clairvoyant named Paige Mahoney, who roams the
streets of London, circa 2059, until the secret police send her off to a
penal colony that looks a lot like Oxford. “Her imagination is so
extraordinary,” Pringle says. “She reminds me of the Bront sisters — the
world she’s created is absolutely real.” Book rights have sold in 18
countries, and three major studios fought over the movie rights.
(Britain’s Imaginarium Studios beat out Hollywood.) Shannon, now in her
last year at college, is juggling writing with her studies like she did
for the first book. “I had to cut down on going out with my friends so I
could squeeze in writing chapters,” she says. “There was a lot of
coffee involved.” LIESL SCHILLINGER
MIKE KRIEGER & KEVIN SYSTROM
Founders of Instagram
Compared to the many programming marvels clogging
the iTunes App store in 2010, the offering unveiled by a pair of
Stanford grads one October day didn’t really do that much. It simply let
you take a picture with your smartphone (nothing novel about that) and
post it online (ditto).
But putting these two commonplace functions together somehow made both of them feel fresh. It was, in the words of the Instagram founders Kevin Systrom, 29, and Mike Krieger, 26, “like a chemical reaction.”
Neither of the partners had a typical background in computer science or design. They describe themselves as “torn between the world of art and the world of technology.” But in that middle ground they struck pay dirt, and the product instantly became a breakthrough hit. Two years after its debut, the app was one of the iPhone’s most popular applications, with a user base nearing 30 million, success that prompted Facebook to scoop the company up for a reported $1 billion last spring.
What was Instagram’s secret? Looking back, the founders made a few key design decisions that proved critical. First, they removed the choice of portrait (vertical) or landscape (horizontal) by limiting images to a square (both). Steve Jobs’s famous insight that good design is less about what’s added than what’s subtracted has never been more amply demonstrated. Second, Instagram let you “design” the emotional tone of a photo through instant effects — bringing the power of Photoshop filters to the mobile generation and giving the most mundane of snapshots the instant nostalgia of an old Polaroid.
Instagram has transported users back to the carefree days when a single, simple button and the right subject matter was all you needed to share a magical moment with family and friends. It put good design in all of our hands, and helped us make our photos — maybe even our lives — seem a little more memorable. JOHN MAEDA
But putting these two commonplace functions together somehow made both of them feel fresh. It was, in the words of the Instagram founders Kevin Systrom, 29, and Mike Krieger, 26, “like a chemical reaction.”
Neither of the partners had a typical background in computer science or design. They describe themselves as “torn between the world of art and the world of technology.” But in that middle ground they struck pay dirt, and the product instantly became a breakthrough hit. Two years after its debut, the app was one of the iPhone’s most popular applications, with a user base nearing 30 million, success that prompted Facebook to scoop the company up for a reported $1 billion last spring.
What was Instagram’s secret? Looking back, the founders made a few key design decisions that proved critical. First, they removed the choice of portrait (vertical) or landscape (horizontal) by limiting images to a square (both). Steve Jobs’s famous insight that good design is less about what’s added than what’s subtracted has never been more amply demonstrated. Second, Instagram let you “design” the emotional tone of a photo through instant effects — bringing the power of Photoshop filters to the mobile generation and giving the most mundane of snapshots the instant nostalgia of an old Polaroid.
Instagram has transported users back to the carefree days when a single, simple button and the right subject matter was all you needed to share a magical moment with family and friends. It put good design in all of our hands, and helped us make our photos — maybe even our lives — seem a little more memorable. JOHN MAEDA
CREDITS: Hair
by Enrico Mariotti for Kérastase at See Management; makeup by Justine
Purdue for Chanel Beauté at Tim Howard Management. Fashion assistants:
Alex Tudela and Angela Koh.
0 comments:
Post a Comment